On Being an Ally: LGBTQIA+ Rights & Protections

This case highlights the controversy involving Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev) and transgender social media influencer, Dylan Mulvaney, which stirred significant debate over LGBTQIA+ rights and corporate allyship. AB InBev faced backlash for its handling of the partnership with Mulvaney, leading to a noticeable drop in Bud Light sales and sparking discussions on the authenticity of corporate support for LGBTQIA+ communities.

The incident exemplifies the delicate balance companies must maintain between expressing solidarity with marginalised groups and navigating the expectations of their broader consumer base, raising important questions about “rainbow-washing” and the genuine integration of inclusive values.

The case underscores the ongoing struggle for equality, acceptance, and recognition faced by the LGBTQIA+ community, showcasing both advancements and persistent forms of intolerance. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the specific context in which policies are applied, acknowledging the volatile and multifaceted nature of the challenges encountered. The case also delves into the subsequent backlash, resulting in a substantial decline in Bud Light sales.

Anheuser-Busch’s response, marked by a tepid apology and organizational shifts, raises questions about corporate responsibility, authenticity in allyship, and the translation of support into tangible actions. Thus shedding light on the broader socio-political context, where progressive corporations find themselves at odds with traditional supporters, reflecting the evolving dynamics in corporate America. The critique faced by Bud Light coincides with legislative proposals targeting transgender individuals, illustrating the brand’s inadvertent entanglement in contentious issues.

The case concludes by highlighting the need for companies to navigate community backlash, avoid accusations of “rainbow-washing,” and translate statements of support into substantive policies that foster inclusivity.

Context

Uneasy

Belonging

Precarious

Outcome

Rejection

Stephen Sawyer
Stephen Sawyer

PI of WP2 and responsible for France data collection

Zona Zarić
Zona Zarić

Postdoctoral Fellow and WP2 co-lead

Learn more about this topic

Fallacies in the Concept of Gender in Iraq

After 2003, Iraq made significant strides towards integrating human rights into its national framework, spurred by its interim and subsequent 2005 permanent constitution which ...

The Dialectic of Women’s Political Participation in Iraq in the Face of Hate Speech Leading to Violence

Following the 2003 transition to democracy, Iraq has actively pursued the enhancement of women’s rights and political participation. This effort was influenced by both ...

Freedom of Expression in an Era of Extremism

This case-study explores a good and a bad example of balances being struck around freedom of expression and the protection of minorities or national ...

Northern Ireland: a Case-Study of Bringing Extremists in From the Cold

There are lessons for the rest of Europe and beyond in countering everyday extremism, as well as terrorism and populism, from the conflict, known ...

Read the whole case

Our Regulatory Rights Toolkit for Attuning Everyday Extremism is available free of charge and will allow you to delve deeper into the topics of your interest.